|
Post by merasmag on Feb 10, 2023 21:54:43 GMT -5
|
|
forego
UpInClass Member
Posts: 371
|
Post by forego on Feb 11, 2023 21:46:23 GMT -5
If it's "the appearance of impropriety", then Baffert should be get additional years for his lame ass denials and excuses for the positives in the first place.
|
|
|
Post by arsignman on Feb 12, 2023 8:54:38 GMT -5
I agree forego, he always has excuses and makes stupid denials and yes more years!!!!
|
|
shoes
UpInClass Steward
Posts: 2,181
|
Post by shoes on Feb 12, 2023 16:45:01 GMT -5
This suggests to me that Baffert's lawyers think they are losing. (Motion filed a year after the judge has been on the case).
|
|
|
Post by merasmag on Feb 12, 2023 17:02:11 GMT -5
This suggests to me that Baffert's lawyers think they are losing. I agree, but am going a step further. She reprimanded them to the point they went to dig why she was making it almost personal and threatening and then found out a possible, provable, reason on the 8th and filed the motion on the 10th. So they'll argue that year doesn't matter because they filed within days of finding the potential conflict. And yes, they know if she stays on they'll lose.
|
|
|
Post by cherokeescot on Feb 12, 2023 17:40:00 GMT -5
|
|
1hooper
UpInClass Steward
Posts: 6,846
|
Post by 1hooper on Feb 12, 2023 17:49:38 GMT -5
He deserves the Dutrow ban, 10 years.
|
|
|
Post by merasmag on Feb 14, 2023 22:35:18 GMT -5
dutrow didn't deserve the dutrow ban. it obviously had no deterrent effect
|
|
|
Post by merasmag on Feb 14, 2023 22:37:55 GMT -5
in fact, in this world it probably made men want to try to prove they were better "moveruppers". sorry 2 be a downer but i've been watching this quiteawhile
|
|
|
Post by merasmag on Feb 15, 2023 22:39:09 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by merasmag on Feb 15, 2023 22:42:23 GMT -5
|
|
1hooper
UpInClass Steward
Posts: 6,846
|
Post by 1hooper on Feb 15, 2023 22:57:41 GMT -5
dutrow didn't deserve the dutrow ban. it obviously had no deterrent effect You're correct. He deserved 20.
|
|
|
Post by merasmag on Feb 15, 2023 23:07:12 GMT -5
dutrow didn't deserve the dutrow ban. it obviously had no deterrent effect You're correct. He deserved 20. why? did he buzz a horse during a race or tell someone else to? did he have a jock not try to win a bet? did he tell an owner a horse was fine when it was dying?
|
|
|
Post by merasmag on Feb 15, 2023 23:11:23 GMT -5
if you're as old as u say u are u should know PLENTY of people that did worse than what dutrow was even accused of. he told the nyra to fo as i recall and was his own worst enemy (as was widely acknowledged at the time). don't change the facts for whatever kids might read this...lol
|
|
|
Post by merasmag on Feb 15, 2023 23:12:45 GMT -5
and exactly who has that ban deterred? it's about up
|
|
|
Post by cherokeescot on Feb 17, 2023 21:50:09 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Badactor on Feb 17, 2023 22:03:22 GMT -5
|
|
1hooper
UpInClass Steward
Posts: 6,846
|
Post by 1hooper on Mar 30, 2023 21:13:52 GMT -5
Bob Baffert lawyer Clark Brewster is also the current lawyer for Stormy Daniels. Can't make it up.
|
|
|
Post by merasmag on Mar 31, 2023 0:16:27 GMT -5
o...kay...now THAT'S funny
|
|